‘Disturbing pattern’: US judge rebukes ‘missteps’ in James Comey indictment

A magistrate justice successful the United States has issued a stern rebuke to the medication of President Donald Trump, criticising its handling of the indictment against a erstwhile manager of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), James Comey.

On Monday, Judge William Fitzpatrick of Alexandria, Virginia, made the antithetic determination to bid the merchandise of each expansive assemblage materials related to the indictment.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 3John Bolton pleads not blameworthy to mishandling classified accusation successful US
• list 2 of 3Trump adversary Letitia James pleads not blameworthy successful owe fraud case
• list 3 of 3James Comey, Letitia James reason US lawyer successful their cases hired illegally

Normally, expansive assemblage materials are kept concealed to support witnesses, defendants and jurors successful cases of sedate national crimes.

But successful Comey’s case, Fitzpatrick ruled determination was “a tenable ground to question whether the government’s behaviour was willful oregon successful reckless disregard of the law”, and that greater transparency was truthful required.

He cited respective irregularities successful the case, ranging from however grounds was obtained to alleged misstatements from prosecutors that could person swayed the expansive jury.

“The procedural and substantive irregularities that occurred earlier the expansive jury, and the mode successful which grounds presented to the expansive assemblage was collected and used, whitethorn emergence to the level of authorities misconduct,” Fitzpatrick wrote successful his 24-page decision.

Fitzpatrick clarified that his determination does not render the expansive assemblage materials public. But they volition beryllium provided to Comey’s defence team, arsenic the erstwhile FBI manager seeks to person the indictment tossed.

“The Court recognizes that the alleviation sought by the defence is seldom granted,” Fitzpatrick wrote, underscoring the antithetic quality of the proceedings.

“However, the grounds points to a disturbing signifier of profound investigative missteps.”

Scrutiny of US Attorney Halligan

The determination is the latest stumble for interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan, a erstwhile idiosyncratic lawyer to Trump whom helium past appointed arsenic a apical national prosecutor.

A specializer successful security instrumentality with nary prosecutorial background, Halligan was tapped earlier this twelvemonth to regenerate acting US Attorney Erik Siebert successful the Eastern District of Virginia.

Trump has indicated helium fired Siebert implicit disagreements astir Justice Department investigations.

According to media reports, Siebert had refrained from seeking indictments against salient Trump critics, specified arsenic Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, citing insufficient evidence.

But that appears to person frustrated the president. Trump went truthful acold arsenic to telephone for Comey’s and James’s prosecutions connected societal media, arsenic good arsenic that of Democratic Senator Adam Schiff.

“They’re each blameworthy arsenic hell, but thing is going to beryllium done,” Trump wrote successful a post addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi. “We can’t hold immoderate longer, it’s sidesplitting our estimation and credibility.”

Halligan took up her station arsenic acting US lawyer connected September 22. By September 25, she had filed her first large indictment, against Comey.

It charged Comey with making a “false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement” to the US Senate, thereby obstructing a legislature inquiry.

A second indictment, against James, was issued connected October 9. And a third came connected October 16, targeting erstwhile nationalist information advisor John Bolton, different salient Trump critic.

All 3 individuals person denied wrongdoing and person sought to person their cases dismissed. Each has besides accused President Trump of utilizing the ineligible strategy for governmental retribution against perceived adversaries.

Monday’s tribunal ruling is not the archetypal clip Halligan’s indictments person travel nether scrutiny, though.

Just past week, US District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie heard petitions from James and Comey questioning whether Halligan’s assignment arsenic US lawyer was legal.

As she weighed the petitions past Thursday, she questioned wherefore determination was a spread successful the expansive assemblage grounds for Comey’s indictment, wherever nary tribunal newsman appeared to beryllium present.

Inside Fitzpatrick’s ruling

Fitzpatrick raised the aforesaid contented successful his ruling connected Monday. He questioned whether the transcript and audio signaling of the expansive assemblage deliberations were, successful fact, complete.

He pointed retired that the expansive assemblage successful Comey’s lawsuit was primitively presented with a three-count indictment, which it rejected. Those deliberations started astatine astir 4:28pm section time.

But by 6:40pm, the expansive assemblage had allegedly weighed a 2nd indictment and recovered that determination was probable origin for 2 of the 3 counts.

Fitzpatrick said that the span of clip betwixt those 2 points was not “sufficient” to “draft the 2nd indictment, motion the 2nd indictment, contiguous it to the expansive jury, supply ineligible instructions to the expansive jury, and springiness them an accidental to deliberate”.

Either the tribunal grounds was incomplete, Fitzpatrick said, oregon the expansive assemblage weighed an indictment that had not been afloat presented successful court.

The justice besides acknowledged questions astir however grounds had been obtained successful the Comey case.

The Trump medication was facing a five-year statute of limitations successful the Comey case, expiring connected September 30. The indictment pertains to statements Comey made earlier the Senate Judiciary Committee successful 2020.

To rapidly find grounds for the indictment, Fitzpatrick said that national prosecutors look to person utilized warrants that were issued for a antithetic case.

Those warrants, however, were constricted to an probe into Daniel Richman, an subordinate of Comey who was probed for the alleged theft of authorities spot and the unlawful gathering of nationalist information information.

No charges were filed successful the Richman case, and the probe was closed successful 2021.

“The Richman materials sat dormant with the FBI until the summertime of 2025, erstwhile the Bureau chose to rummage done them again,” Fitzpatrick said.

He said the national government’s usage of the warrants could interruption the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, which prohibits the unreasonable hunt and seizure of evidence. He described the Justice Department’s actions arsenic “cavalier” and asserted that nary precautions were taken to support privileged information.

“Inexplicably, the authorities elected not to question a caller warrant for the 2025 search, adjacent though the 2025 probe was focused connected a antithetic person, was exploring a fundamentally antithetic ineligible theory, and was predicated connected an wholly antithetic acceptable of transgression offenses,” Fitzpatrick wrote.

He speculated that prosecutors whitethorn not person sought a caller warrant due to the fact that the hold would person allowed the statute of limitations to expire connected the Comey case.

“The Court recognizes that a nonaccomplishment to question a caller warrant nether these circumstances is highly unusual,” helium said.

Fitzpatrick besides raised concerns that statements national prosecutors made to the expansive assemblage whitethorn person been misleading.

Many of those statements were redacted successful Fitzpatrick’s ruling. But helium described them as “fundamental misstatements of the instrumentality that could compromise the expansive assemblage process”.

One statement, helium said, “may person reasonably acceptable an anticipation successful the minds of the expansive assemblage that alternatively than the authorities carnivore the load to beryllium Mr. Comey’s guilt beyond a tenable uncertainty astatine trial, the load shifts to Mr. Comey to explicate distant the government’s evidence”.

Another appeared to suggest that the expansive assemblage “did not person to trust lone connected the grounds earlier them to
determine probable cause” — and that much grounds would beryllium presented aboriginal on.

Calling for the merchandise of the expansive assemblage records connected Monday was an “extraordinary remedy” for these issues, Fitzpatrick conceded.

But it was necessary, fixed “the imaginable that authorities misconduct whitethorn person tainted the expansive assemblage proceedings”, helium yet decided.