
Elon Musk's 2018 CEO wage bundle from Tesla, worthy immoderate $56 cardinal erstwhile it vested, indispensable beryllium restored, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled Friday.
"We reverse the Court of Chancery's rescission remedy and grant $1 successful nominal damages," the judges wrote successful their opinion.
In the decision, the Delaware Supreme Court judges said a little court's determination to cancel Musk's 2018 wage program was excessively utmost a remedy and that the little tribunal did not springiness Tesla a accidental to accidental what a just compensation ought to be.
The determination connected the entreaty successful this case, known arsenic Tornetta v. Musk, apt ends the yearslong combat implicit Musk's record-setting compensation.
Musk's nett worthy is presently estimated astatine astir $679.4 billion, according to the Forbes Real Time Billionaires List.
Dorothy Lund, a prof astatine Columbia Law School, told CNBC that portion the Friday sentiment whitethorn reconstruct the 2018 wage program for Musk, it leaves the remainder of the little court's determination unaddressed and intact.
"The tribunal had antecedently decided that Musk was a controlling shareholder of Tesla and that the Tesla committee and helium arranged an unfair wage program for him," she said. "None of that was reversed successful this decision."
"We are arrogant to person participated successful the historical verdict below, calling to relationship the Tesla committee and its largest stockholder for their breaches of fiduciary duty," lawyers representing plaintiff Richard J. Tornetta said successful an e-mailed statement.
Tesla did not instantly respond to requests for comment.
The Delaware Supreme Court issued the bid per curiam with nary azygous justice taking recognition for penning the sentiment and nary dissent noted.
Musk's 2018 CEO wage bundle from Tesla, comprised of 12 milestone-based tranches of stock, was unprecedented astatine the clip it was proposed. After it was granted, the wage program made Musk the wealthiest idiosyncratic successful the world.
Tesla shareholder Tornetta sued Tesla, filing a derivative enactment successful 2018, accusing Musk and the company's committee of a breach of their fiduciary duties.
Delaware's business-specialized Court of Chancery decided successful January 2024 that the wage program was improperly granted and ordered it to beryllium rescinded.
In her decision, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick besides recovered that Musk "controlled Tesla," and that the process starring to the board's support of his 2018 wage program was "deeply flawed."
Among different things, she recovered the Tesla committee did not disclose each the worldly accusation they should person to investors earlier asking them to ballot connected and o.k. the plan.
After the earlier Tornetta ruling, Musk moved Tesla's tract of incorporation retired of Delaware, bashed McCormick by sanction successful posts connected his societal web X, formerly Twitter, wherever helium has tens of millions of followers, and called for different entrepreneurs to reincorporate extracurricular of the state.
Tesla besides attempted to "ratify" the 2018 CEO wage program by holding a 2nd ballot with shareholders successful 2024.
In November, Tesla shareholders voted to approve an adjacent larger CEO compensation program for Musk.
The 2025 wage program consists of 12 tranches of shares to beryllium granted to the CEO if Tesla hits certain milestones over the adjacent decennary and is worthy astir $1 trillion successful total. The caller program could besides summation Musk's voting powerfulness implicit the institution from astir 13% contiguous to astir 25%.
Shareholders had besides approved a program to regenerate Musk's 2018 CEO wage if the Tornetta determination was upheld connected appeal. That program is present nullified.
As CNBC antecedently reported, a instrumentality steadfast that presently represents Tesla successful this entreaty penned a bill to overhaul firm instrumentality successful Delaware earlier this year. The measure was passed by the Delaware legislature successful March, and if it had applied retroactively, it could person affected the result of this case.
Read the Delaware Supreme Court's ruling here.











English (US) ·